Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 15:10
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
What are some reasons why men may not want to date a woman who can pay her own bills?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Can a teenager take boron? (Read my comment below for more context if you wish)
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
AI-Focused Apple Music Reboot Said to Be in the Works - MacRumors
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is a good comeback for when someone calls you flat?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.